A Response to Historians in Cahoot by Tristram Hunt Essay

Political speeches are of course meticulously designed not to sound like, well, a political speech. Tristam range had seen through the design of chairperson George W. Bushs inaugural speech in 2005. In Hunts member, Historians in Cahoot, he pointed out the heavy use of the term biography. President Bush had repeatedly mentioned historic events that range from the formulation of the declaration of independence to the tragic 911 attacks. Hunts article is seemingly arguing that history could be used as a political tool. hatful are attracted to history. It could be nostalgia, or it could just be that history is always presented in a encase forma packaged form in a sense that the past events are already modified and consequently stripped of the other details. Moreover, history is often accused of being biased. Before the article had actually started, there was a suggestion for reading that suggests that there is a distinction between history as inspiration and history as instruction . Aside from the fact that the suggestion for reading had served its purpose as a guide, it leads the readers to a profound realization about history. There is a hint in Hunts article that the Bush administration would pattern its style of governance according to what had already transpired in historya style of governance which is likely to be leaning to only a small-scale portion of the society.